U.S. stocks falter, overseas stocks rally: start of a tectonic shift?
International stocks strongly outperformed their U.S. counterparts last week. Is this a sustainable market trend or just a blip on the screen?
The week of March 3, 2025, saw a sharp shift in investor sentiment from U.S. to international equity markets, with the latter surging on growing hopes of fiscal stimulus measures (particularly coming out of China and Germany) and a 25 basis point interest-rate cut by the European Central Bank (ECB). In a reversal of the prevailing trend observed for much of the past few years, the MSCI EAFE Index and the MSCI All Country World (MSCI ACWI) ex-USA Index both outperformed the S&P 500 Index, which lost ground for the week amid mounting investor worries about U.S. trade policy (tariffs) and the risk of a slowing U.S. economy in the months ahead—what we’re currently calling a “U.S.-only growth scare.” More cyclical S&P 500 sectors like consumer discretionary and financials were hit the hardest last week.
What in the world is going on with global equities?
From a historical standpoint, the gap by which non-U.S. stocks outpaced their U.S. counterparts over the mere span of a week was a massive outlier. In fact, a one-week outperformance of such magnitude has occurred less than 1% of the time over the past 25 years and has typically followed bouts of recession and/or bear markets, such as the 2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 COVID pandemic. During those past periods, in contrast to last week, markets had been down before switching to a recovery mode that lifted the fortunes of cyclical stocks levered to global economic growth. That makes last week’s geographic performance pattern—with international beating U.S. stocks by a wide margin—even more unusual relative to history.
U.S. vs international stocks: largest weekly outperformance gaps over the past 25 years
| Date (week ended) | S&P 500 Index return (%) | MSCI ACWI ex-USA Index (USD) return (%) | International outperformance vs. U.S. (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/12/08 | 0.48 | 8.93 | 8.45 |
| 3/20/20 | -14.95 | -7.61 | 7.34 |
| 3/28/08 | -1.04 | 5.15 | 6.19 |
| 3/07/25 | -3.06 | 2.62 | 5.68 |
| 11/04/22 | -3.31 | 2.12 | 5.43 |
| 3/20/09 | 1.59 | 6.94 | 5.35 |
| 7/19/02 | -7.98 | -2.87 | 5.11 |
| 5/20/22 | -3.00 | 1.97 | 4.97 |
| 1/30/09 | -0.71 | 4.14 | 4.85 |
| 9/21/01 | -11.56 | -6.84 | 4.72 |
However, it’s important to highlight that what’s different about today’s macro environment renders historical parallels difficult to apply. Unlike what we’ve typically seen in the United States over the years, where fiscal spending is often in response to a recession, we’re now seeing non-U.S. economies that are not in recession potentially undertaking such government spending. Specifically, from an economic cycle perspective, the recent prospect of fiscal stimulus measures coming out of China and Germany appears to have sent a signal to the markets that a new, stronger global cycle may be on the horizon.
Is non-U.S. market outperformance sustainable?
The global currency markets have had a significant impact on regional equity market performance year to date, with the U.S. dollar essentially getting crushed relative to many overseas currencies—but that’s only part of the story here. In our view, the sustainability of non-U.S. equity outperformance going forward will also depend on the heavily weighted market sectors in the major stock indexes, most notably European financials versus U.S. technology. The latter, the biggest sector in the U.S. market at 31% of the MSCI USA Index,1 has been struggling through the first few months of 2025. At nearly 24% of the MSCI ACWI ex-USA Index,2 non-U.S. financials are the largest sector in that index and have gained 10.5% year to date,3 whereas U.S. financials are only up 1%.4
As of this writing, within the international equity space, we continue to favor portfolio allocations to non-U.S. value stocks over non-U.S. growth stocks (based on better corporate earnings trends and cheaper equity valuations), as well as developed markets over emerging markets. With that being said, we would be careful to not chase non-U.S. equities—now more expensive—too eagerly in the wake of their latest spurt of outperformance over U.S. stocks. At the end of the day, we believe stocks from both equity camps will find themselves more or less subject to the same global economic cycle. Accordingly, our long-term investment approach remains to invest in “companies, not countries” or, said another way, “stocks, not economies,” wherever they may be located.
We would be careful to not chase non-U.S. equities—now more expensive—too eagerly in the wake of their latest spurt of outperformance over U.S. stocks.
1 Source: MSCI, as of 3/7/25. 2 Source: MSCI, as of 3/7/25. 3 Source: FactSet, as of 3/7/25. 4 Source: FactSet, as of 3/7/25.
Important disclosures
The S&P 500 Index tracks the performance of 500 of the largest publicly traded companies in the United States. The MSCI EAFE Index tracks the performance of large and mid-sized companies in developed markets outside the U.S. and Canada. The acronym "EAFE" stands for Europe, Australasia, and the Far East. The MSCI USA Index tracks the performance of publicly traded large- and mid-cap stocks of the U.S. market. The MSCI All Country World (MSCI ACWI) ex-USA Index tracks the performance of large and mid-sized companies across 22 of 23 developed markets countries (excluding the U.S.) and 24 emerging markets countries. With 2,056 constituents, it covers approximately 85% of the global equity opportunity set outside the U.S. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
Investing involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. Financial markets are volatile and can fluctuate significantly in response to company, industry, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. The information provided does not take into account the suitability, investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific person.
Views are those of the authors and are subject to change. No forecasts are guaranteed. This commentary is provided for informational purposes only and is not an endorsement of any security, mutual fund, sector, or index, and is not indicative of any John Hancock fund. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or eliminate the risk of a loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
All overviews and commentary are intended to be general in nature and for current interest. While helpful, these overviews are no substitute for professional tax, investment or legal advice. Clients and prospects should seek professional advice for their particular situation. Neither Manulife Investment Management, nor any of its affiliates or representatives (collectively “Manulife Investment Management”) is providing tax, investment or legal advice.
This material is intended for the exclusive use of recipients in jurisdictions who are allowed to receive the material under their applicable law. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and are subject to change without notice. Our investment teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. These opinions may not necessarily reflect the views of Manulife Investment Management. The information and/or analysis contained in this material has been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, but Manulife Investment Management does not make any representation as to their accuracy, correctness, usefulness, or completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from the use of the information and/or analysis contained. The information in this material may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets, management discipline, or other expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. The information in this document, including statements concerning financial market trends, are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Manulife Investment Management disclaims any responsibility to update such information.
Manulife Investment Management shall not assume any liability or responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage or any other consequence of any person acting or not acting in reliance on the information contained here. This material was prepared solely for informational purposes, does not constitute a recommendation, professional advice, an offer or an invitation by or on behalf of Manulife Investment Management to any person to buy or sell any security or adopt any investment approach, and is no indication of trading intent in any fund or account managed by Manulife Investment Management. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Diversification or asset allocation doesn’t guarantee a profit or protect against the risk of loss in any market. Unless otherwise specified, all data is sourced from Manulife Investment Management. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This material has not been reviewed by, and is not registered with, any securities or other regulatory authority, and may, where appropriate, be distributed by Manulife Investment Management and its subsidiaries and affiliates, which includes the John Hancock Investment Management brand.
Copyright 2025 by Manulife Investment Management. Manulife Wealth and/or Manulife Private Wealth are using with permission. The statements and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. Manulife Wealth and/ or Manulife Private Wealth cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data.
Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, Stylized M Design, Manulife Investment Management & Stylized M Design, Manulife Wealth & Stylized M Design and Manulife Private Wealth & Stylized M Design are trademarks of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and are used by it, and by its affiliates under license.
4309376